The visual that remains for me more than others, from Carli Lloyd’s for the ages performance in the USWNT’s W over Japan for the World Cup title, is not from any of her once, twice, thrice hat trick in the game’s first sixteen minutes.
Though those are magnificent visions.
It is the head shot of Lloyd, the look on her face, after she missed what could have been, should have been her fourth goal of the final’s opening half.
Lloyd had a relatively unimpeded, just about point blank header. Which she knocked wide.
The camera caught Lloyd, mouth agape, eyes bright but quizzical, with a look of how did that not net?
So, in the zone was Lloyd, it was as if she couldn’t conceptualize missing such a chance.
Her performance, arguably one of the greatest in sports on such a world stage, was, but for that miss, just as she planned. During training, Lloyd continually visualized tallying four goals in the final.
As it was, she scored six in the knockout phase of the competition, three in her stupendous final performance. One has to hope she forgives herself for falling a goal short of her plan.
But, let’s be clear, it’s not like her three successes aren’t worth considering one more time.
The first came on a corner three minutes in. The ball arching from the right corner, Ms. Carli zoomed in an arc from her spot on the left, catching the ball perfectly as it reached kick level. Japan’s goalkeep Kaihori guessed right. Lloyd went left.
Two minutes later, Japan’s defense failed to clear on a free kick. Ball bouncing in front of the net, Lloyd again was perfectly positioned. Kaihori guessed left. Lloyd went right.
Goal three epitomized how very much of the moment Lloyd was. Dribbling the ball on a counterattack, approaching midfield, she maneuvered past the defender. Eyes on the goal, she realized from half the pitch away that Kaihori had ventured too far from the goal. Lloyd deftly let it rip from fifty yards, a pop fly that just cleared the Japanese beleaguered keeper, nudged the left post, and nestled into the net, a confirmation that the tournament’s best player was not going to allow defeat.
Three nil. Game. Championship.
With 74 minutes and stoppage time left to play.
* * * * *
The other fascinating vision, for me anyway, came during the thrill of victory celebration after final whistle.
Elder Abby Wambach, scorer of 183 career international goals, who had sublimated her competitive fire to accept a lesser role in the World Cup, raced toward the stands. Where she found wife Sarah Huffman, who leaned perilously, dangling over the railing for a victory buss.
While Wambach’s personal life, her sexual orientation, have hardly been a secret, one has to ask: Would Wambach and Huffman have expressed their joy so publicly, if the Supreme Court, just the week before, hadn’t given its imprimatur to gay marriage?
* * * * *
It is generally recognized that Brandi Chastain’s baring her bra victory moment after the 1999 World Cup title empowered America’s young females to take up soccer.
It is said that the U.S. of A. now has two million girls and women playing competitive soccer at one level or another.
I find it interesting that the WNT squad appeared so Caucasian.
* * * * *
The final of the Women’s World Cup had the largest TV audience for any soccer game ever in the United States. That includes games played by both genders.
According to the New York Times, it also had a larger audience than last year’s World Series Game 7. And a larger audience than Golden State’s clinching Game 6 W in this year’s NBA Finals.1
— Seedy K
8 thoughts on “Praise the Lloyd: U.S. Women Reign”
I have a hard time believing that the finals drew a bigger audience than the WS7 or game 6 of the NBA finals….I was in the Flora Bama bar in Orange Beach Alabama and to start the game maybe 20 of 500+/- people were watching the game. By the time it was 4-0 there were maybe 6.
Maybe the Red-neck Riviera was not indicative of soccer’s popularity, but I got to think there would be more drunks watching baseball or basketball than that….
BTW….\Duke played Ky in the finals? I must have missed that one for a soccer match….
Oops. Duke vs. Wisconsin. Of course. Big Blue Brain Fart. I shall correct, thanks. Source for TV audience is NY Times.
Mr. Joyner, the source for my info (which, frankly, I should have credited): http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/07/sports/soccer/womens-world-cup-final-was-most-watched-soccer-game-in-united-states-history.html?action=click&contentCollection=Soccer&module=RelatedCoverage®ion=Marginalia&pgtype=article
I have now credited my source.
Maybe if the NBA finals and NCAA championships didn’t start around bedtime, they’d get a 23 million person audience as well.
I wholeheartedly agree with Cardizen. The game started at 7, a reasonable time for all and probably that had something to do with the viewership. I watched the whole game and can’t stand soccer and that was one of the reasons. Another thing I like about soccer is the paucity of substitutions and the specific length of time of the games. It took two minutes to play the last two minutes unlike basketball where it takes twenty minutes to play the last two minutes and baseball where there might be ten substitute pitchers in a game. Even the so called extra time is minor.
Actually it took three minutes to play the last two minutes. A minute of stoppage time was added.
Comments are closed.